ALEXANDER v. CLEVELAND CLINIC, 130 Ohio St.3d 401 (2011)
Court: Supreme Court of Ohio
Number: inohco20111123790
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 23, 2011
Summary: { 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted. { 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc., 130 Ohio St.3d 168 , 2011-Ohio-4609, 956 N.E.2d 825. O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Dohme v. Eurand Am., Inc., 130 Ohio St.3d 168, 2011-Ohio-4609, 956 N.E.2d 825.
O'CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
